Yes why? Do we do that because we received Exceptional Service or did someone go the extra mile or just because it is expected? It’s a strange habit, supposedly voluntary as a reward for good service and generally reserved for the Hospitality Industry. I mean you’re not going to tip your Doctor, are you? Or the Plumber, Electrician, the Banker, of course not. So what do we expect from our Waitron, that horrible word, who ever thought of it? Swift and accurate service? What if the steak is overdone but the Waitron put in the right order, do we tip the chefs too? If so what about the cleaners and the candle stick makers, you get the picture. And this voluntary thing, if it isn’t what’s the point. It should be a reward for exceptional service at your discretion, not so? Ever noticed on some restaurant menus, the wording, “For parties of 6 or more we will add 10%” or some such statement. Where’s the choice? Just gone out of the window, it’s compulsory, isn’t it? Why only for large parties and not for just the two of you, who knows. Some demand it for any number of guests anyway. Actually I find it a degrading habit, carried through the ages, having to virtually beg for your wages for the work you do but being dependant on others to do theirs properly. Look at the other side, don’t assume that your Tip will necessarily reach the person you choose to reward. Some places do but most throw it into a pot to be shared out with others, taking away the purpose of the tip. If we tell the Waitron that we will Tip big, would that be bribery? Imagine saying, “Well Doc, if you give me a good diagnoses, I’ll give you a big tip”. One reason why we still tip in this country, unlike Europe, is that that money generally bypasses the Income Tax. Our Chief Honcho, Gordhan, hasn’t closed that loophole yet but watch this space. Also most restaurants etc. take the tips into account when working out the wages, including the minimum wage rules. So in my opinion it’s an obsolete part of tradition and lets just build it into the price. If the Waitrons don’t perform, fire them or just don’t go back there again, same as with your Plumber or any other service provider you use. The catch is of course, every restaurant would have to do it at the same time or there would be all sorts of confusion about prices. I’ll bet there’s some sort of authority, there always is, who could.
A bit the same with discounts. Certain industries have developed with highly discounted pricing, regularly offering 50% off and so on but of course all their competitors do the same, they have to or they wouldn’t be competitive. It’s all just how things develop but it’s confusing just the same and you’ve got to have your wits about you not to get caught paying more than you should. The Europeans seemed to have sorted themselves out and what you see is what you pay, no haggling, price is fixed and inclusive. The American haven’t and are the leaders in this game of extras, taxes, tips and any other way they can add something to the price you pay. Which would you prefer?





Hennie Pieterse
Ek het ‘n besluit geneem om fooitjies in die volgende lig te beskou. Van die oomblik wat die “kelner” jou laat aansit, is hy in jou diens. Hy gaan jou belang mos nou, teen ‘n fooi, by die ander partye verteenwoordig. Hy is nou jou agent. Jy moet hom egter baie mooi laat verstaan wat sy posisie is. Van daardie oomblik af moet jy nie skroom om jou ervaring van die RESTAURANT SE DIENS (gerief/ongerief/gemak/ongemak/positief/negatief) aan hom te kommunikeer nie. Hy sal dan die probleem namens jou by die ANDER PARTY gaan beredder/beding.
Die rede hiervoor is dat die “kelner” selde verantwoordelik is vir die optimale en doeltreffende funksionering van die res van die restaurant. Dit is eintlik buite sy beheer. En om dan ‘n fooi van hom te weerhou, word die werklike probleem nooit aangespreek nie. Die restaurant ly geen verlies, of leer geen les nie. Die “kelner” moet weet jy gaan nie ‘n koue bord spek en eiers of biefstuk aanvaar nie – hy moet hom dus nie eers aan jou kom voorsit nie. Hy moet dit dadelik in die kombuis uitsorteer. Dieselfde geld vir ander aspekte soos vuil tafels, vuil skottelgoed ens.
Jy kan nou seker reeds die probleem hier sien ontvou. Die “kelner” moet nou teen , wie hy DINK sy werkgewer is, optree. Dit veroorsaak ‘n konflik van belange. Die arme mens weet nie vir wie hy eintlik werk nie. Sy werk kan in gedrang kom. Hy kan ongewild raak en in onguns verval ens.
Dit is duidelik dat die restaurant eienaars moet besluit vir wie die “kelner” nou eintlik werk – gaan hy hom betaal, of gaan jy hom betaal. Neem kennis daar is restaurant groepe waar die kelners deel in die omset van die restaurant – dit vervang die nodigheid om ‘n basiese salaris te betaal. Dit wil sê daar is eintlik reeds vir ‘n “fooi” voorsiening gemaak, en die “kelner” verteenwoordig dus die restaurant.
Die volgende probleem wat mens dan moet uitsorteer is die vlak van opleiding. Dit skiet huidiglik ver te kort. Die restaurant bied vir jou die dienste van ‘n agent aan, maar teen watter standaard ? Jy moet dus eintlik jou eie agent kan saamneem as die standaard van agente in die mark nie aanvaarbaar is nie. (Soos ‘n caddie by ‘n golf baan).
Die tyd is ryp om nie maar net alles te aanvaar soos dit TRADITIONEEL gedoen word nie. Ons moet heeltyd vrae vra en dit meet en toets en vergelyk. Die oomblik wat jy in ‘n ooreenkoms ingetree het, is jou keuses wel min tot geen. Maar ons belangrikste keuse is om voor die tyd te besluit waar ons ons geld gaan bestee. En kom nou mense, is ons werklik so verlee om die gemiddelde tot onder gemiddelde diens so gelate te aanvaar. Jy weet jy kan self ‘n beter stuk steak braai as daai ketting restaurant se sogenaamde chef . . . Moenie middelmatigheid aanvaar nie !
Rickvr
Geweldig, so bly dat daar nog mense in ons dorp is wat selfstandig dink en dalk ook so sal maak. Kom mense maak ‘n verskil en “Put your money where your mouth is”. Diens het ‘n slegte woord geword, kom ons maak dit weer dat ons trots daaroor kan wees. Moenie opgee nie.